President Truman's decision to drop Atomic Bomb Assignment

President Trumans decision to drop Atomic Bomb - appellation ExampleIn the quarrel of Walker, a nonher alternative available for Truman was to try a Normandy-type amphibious landing. In this case, the estimated casualty would have been anything around a million (2008, p. 9). That is, though cruel at the first sight, Trumans decision was non less ethical dividen the options available at that point of time.In the words of Wainstock (2013), the japanese government had no respect for the lives of its own citizens and was not trying to save them. For example, though japan faced several critical military defeats along with a crumbling industrial capacity, it exhibited a reluctance to give up the war. In contrast, it adopted highly unethical practices like Kamikaze attacks where suicide bombers were used to target American military (Wainstock, 2013, p. 56). From this point, it is only rational to assume that had the war continued, Japan would have used its every citizen as a human shie ld. Thus, the decision by Truman to end the war instantaneously and unconditionally was the right option at that point of time.Admittedly, Truman was advised that the power of the atomic bomb should be demonstrated to the government of Japan before its actual use so that they could take an informed decision. However, a close analysis reveals that it was not possible for Truman to do so. For example, had the demonstration failed, it would have caused serious damage to America, and Japan would have continued with change magnitude rigor and confidence (Wainstock, 2013). In addition, even if Japanese authorities had known the power of atomic bomb, they would not have ceased. Firstly, Japan was duly warned of a total destruction but there was no attempt from Japan to stop war. Instead, it went on adopting unethical practices like Kamikaze.However, before giving a clean lozenge to Truman, it is wise to assess the other side of the argument as well. Firstly, Goldberg