Modernizing Rulers in the Middle East Assignment

Modernizing Rulers in the Middle East - Assignment ExampleAtaturk was a well-kn feature array man. His victories and losses defined his role as a leader. While Reza Shah was in the military, the people did non gain trust in him due to the lack of victories and losses in actual battle. Since Ataturk was respected more, he could implement the changes and secularization of his country. Reza Shah had to fight for secularization and eventually back down to the pressure from the Shiite faction.Although it might seem that Reza Shah was non as successful as Ataturk, the two men faced different problems. Ataturk unified Turkey as Turkish. Reza Shah had to deal with many different tribes, religious leaders, and separate factions. Ataturk did not face the severe opposition as Reza Shah. Ataturk did face opposition however he managed to unite the Turkish people with a sense of nationalism. Reza Shah did not inspire the same nationalism within his people.Ataturk created a government that wou ld not be successor based. Reza Shahs son succeeded his father. Ataturks government had a inviolable base of elections and fundamental principles. He wanted to create a government, but one that could go on without him. Reza Shah, on the other hand, wanted to create his own personal goals of government with him as the center. That was the main difference between the two men. Ataturk created a secular government that lasted, whereas Reza Shah created one that was not as